Showing posts with label trail funding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trail funding. Show all posts

Sunday, October 2, 2011

New Trail Poll

Yes, government money should be used to build trails!!

100% of the people who responded to last month's poll agreed that tax dollars should be used to pay for some or all of trail funding.
Hopefully Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn is paying attention to our poll. Recently, he said he would refuse to support transportation funding if it included money for trails????

Our next poll is another yes or no answer: Have you ever hiked or biked on a National Scenic Trail?

Below is a list of our National Scenic Trails: (You can obtain a map of the National Trail System from the U.S Department of the Interior.)
mountain bikers on one
of America's great trails


And hopefully, someday we can add: Great Plains Scenic Trail

We'd love to hear about your experience on any of these trails. Please leave a comment below.

Share/Bookmark

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Trails Benefit Communities & Nation

According to recent articles in American Trail magazine, trails provide enormous benefits for communities, workers, and the nation in general.
Here are some important economic figures that relate to the benefits of trails:
hikers enjoying the trail

  • Active outdoor recreation generates $730 million to the economy each year.
  • Trails and other outdoor pursuits provide 6.5 million jobs annually.
  • There are 437 million recreational visits to Interior-managed lands.
  • One U.S. trail generated an estimated 80,000 trips w/ trail users spending $40.8 million.
  • Bicycle recreation supports more than $924 million in tourism.
  • Although the per capita annual cost of trail use is $209, per capita annual direct medical benefits was $564. This means that every dollar spent on trails provided $2.94 in direct medical benefit.
While one U.S. Senator is refusing to vote for highway funding as long as some of the money is going for trails, the opposite should be happening. In light of the figures presented above, and for numerous other reasons, the amount of trail funding in transportation apportionments should be increased. Unlike roads, trails:
  • are cheaper to build
  • are cheaper to maintain
  • provide more jobs per mile
  • provide health benefits
  • provide recreational opportunities
  • provide viable transportation options
  • are much more environmentally sustainable
If you haven't yet done so, contact your representative and urge them to fully fund all trail options in U.S. transportation funding. 

Coming up on the trailsnet blog:
  • Information about new active travel websites
  • Information about a possible huge format change for the trailsnet website
  • Information about new maps to be included on the trailsnet website
  • Information about the National Trails System

Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

rail-trails for sale?

How much are our trails worth to you?

Times are tough, money is tight. We read the headlines every day. Funding will be reduced in an effort to reduce our nation's debt/deficit. As much as we'd like to believe that our precious trails will be exempt from the fiscal guillotine, that probably won't be the case.

So where will the funding come from to add more trails and maintain the current ones? Private donations play a role, but probably won't increase enough to make up for the upcoming government cuts.

In Florida, they have proposed selling the naming rights to their top eight trails to the highest bidder. Imagine such sports arenas as the Coors Field in Boulder, Colorado or the Honda Center in Anaheim. Now apply that to, say the Withlacoochee State Trail. Instead, it might be called the Budweiser State Trail or the Cigna Scenic Trail.

Do you think that's a good idea? I ask that in all sincerity, because I haven't decided yet. If it's done tastefully, it might not be such a bad idea. If the trail goes all commercial, with billboards every half mile, then it could be a nightmare.

Should rail-trails be funded by sponsorship
or trailside advertising?
Other options could include just selling sponsorship of the trailhead or allowing small, informational/advertising signs along the trail. This last suggestion is not as horrible as it sounds if the following rules are applied:

  1. No more than one sign per mile is allowed.
  2. Signs must be small, unobtrusive, and uniform.
  3. Businesses must offer a service that is essential to trail users. Such services would include: lodging, camping, food, trail equipment sales, equipment rentals, equipment service
  4. Signs would be simple, informational, and clear.
The signs suggested above would kill two birds with one stone. They would provide a steady flow of advertising income to the trail. They would provide information to trail users.
Don't picture big, gaudy billboards with garish colors and slogans. Instead, imagine small, wood or faux wood signs that list:
  • Bob's Sporting Goods - .5 miles - trail left
  • Emma's Diner - .3 miles - trail left
  • Shady Cove Campground - .7 miles - trail right
  • Shady Cove General Store - .7 miles - trail right
Only these official signs would be allowed on the trail right-of-way. Rather than advertising, they would be considered "trail sponsorship." Businesses would benefit from trail traffic and trail users would benefit from information about upcoming services. The trail would benefit from the funding.

What do you think? Should private industry be involved in public trails. Leave a comment with your input.

Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Federal Budget Deficit Calculator; Select Proposals to Balance Deficit - AARP Bulletin

I just balanced the federal deficit without cutting a penny from trail funding; and it was easier than I thought it would be.

Now it's your turn to give it a try. Click on the link below and try balancing the budget. It's really quite enjoyable and enlightening.

Federal Budget Deficit Calculator; Select Proposals to Balance Deficit - AARP Bulletin

Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Rails to Trails Conservancy

Please take a couple moments to cast a vote for the Rails to Trails Conservancy in the "Members Project" grant money contest.

Currently the Conservancy is in a tie for first place, so your vote could put them over the top.

Visit the Members Project website to cast your vote for the Rails to Trails Conservancy.

They have made it extremely easy for you to vote, especially if you have a Facebook account. It costs you nothing and could earn $200,000 for new and improved trails. Please vote before Sunday, May 23, 2010.

Thank you!!!

Share/Bookmark

Friday, December 25, 2009

Are trails a waste of money?

Recently, Senator John McCain of Arizona commented "...Congress is frivolously spending the Highway Trust Fund for pet projects like walkways and bicycle paths..."
Do you consider bicycle paths a waste of money?
Now's your chance to voice your opinion.

Share/Bookmark